Anti-Fascism – the new hate culture?

I’ve been to a handful of protests before in my life and at each of which I’ve never once felt the need or urge to engage in violent demonstration.

Protests are a way to show your disapproval at things like a ruling by a Magistrate or even at the actions of a government. But a protest should always be peaceful and law-abiding.

Civil disobedience is stronger way to show disapproval, but even that refrains from violent actions and other crimes such as criminal damage and looting.

I certainly don’t approve of protests which are of a violent nature. So, you might be able to see my dismay when protests get out of hand and turn violent; which is a very self-defeating purpose.

Protests happen all the time, all over the world… The UK, the USA… heck, it’s practically a national sport in France.

But it appears there’re no bunch of people who like a good protest other than, “Social Justice Warriors”. Students, who’ve been brainwashed in their colleges, universities and various clubs and organisations. People who gravitate towards the studies of dead-end subjects like Social Sciences for example.

These SJW’s join various unions and pressure groups such as Hope Not Hate, the Anti-Fascist league and many other far-left groups (most of which have been or are currently funded by globalist, left-wing billionaire, George Soros).

The problem is though, these groups stink of the sulphuric scent of hypocrisy and irony. Their protests are rarely peaceful, they use violence, aggression and almost always cause criminal damage.

These groups, mostly made up of students and those who lean towards communist tendencies, will always say that they protest to stand up for equality, peace, freedom of speech and social justice.

Coincidentally, they always claim to stand up against tyranny, oppression, hate, dictation, violence and discrimination.

“To protest it violently and attack innocent people because of how they voted or because of who they lend support to as president is also a direct violation of their goal for standing up against fascism.”

What’s wrong though is…. No they don’t.

In the United States (and around the world, actually) people are out protesting against the election of Trump as president.

Now, I get that they don’t support the man due to his political standing and from some of the stuff he’s said and done in the past. And they’re well within their right to protest if the vote was inaccurate or rigged or if Trump has done something seriously wrong.

Personally though, I’m not sure what to make of America’s new president. And very recently, he authorised military action against a Syrian government airfield, which I think was a wrong and a disturbing, ill-thought out move. That alone would be a legitimate reason to protest.

But to protest someone because they were elected as president, and calling for a recount or another vote directly violates one of the things these protesters supposedly stand against – fascism.

To protest it violently and attack innocent people because of how they voted or because of who they lend support to as president is also a direct violation of their goal for standing up against fascism. It also directly violates their goal of standing up against Tyranny and promoting freedom of speech.

Many rallies or conferences of support for Donald Trump are often hijacked by these protesters and disrupted by screaming or causing an obstruction – a bit like his inauguration day, when tens of thousands of people couldn’t get to the event due to streets having been shut down by the “anti-fascist” protesters.

But what concerns me most of all is that the protesters are always willing to use violence and carry out criminal activity in order to accomplish their nefarious ambitions.

Below is a video highlight just one example of this.

From what I gather, this man was identified as a Trump supporter. Consequentially, this attracted the attention of protesters out that day who surrounded his vehicle and started hitting and thumping on the windows.

Like buzzards circling round their prey, the gathered round the vehicle to cause as much inconvenience to the man in question.

Then things stooped a bit lower. Someone felt the need to slash his tyres (criminal damage), simply for having a different opinion to the amassed crowd of protesters.

When the man realised this and confronted them, they simply laughed at him. That one person is the embodiment of all the things the protesters vow to combat. No amount of showering of bathing can rid them of the overpowering stench of hypocrisy.

Have a watch by clicking here



An Instrument of Great Evil becomes no more…

Reports are flowing in that Irish terrorist and “politician”, Martin McGuinness has succumbed to a recent illness.

The man, revered by many but hated by more, has a formidable and rather dark history behind him.

During the height of The Troubles in Northern Ireland, McGuinness was Second in Command of the Derry/Londonderry brigade of the terrorist group known as the Irish Republican Army.

Under his command, the terrorist organisation carried out numerous killings and bombings, which targeted civilian locations and claimed the lives of many innocent men, women and children.

The most notable atrocity that McGuinness is reportedly responsible for is that of the Bloody Sunday catastrophe, where a civil rights movement was fired upon by British Soldiers, in which 14 men were killed.

Recent reports and eye-witness accounts presented in the Saville Inquiry, tell of how Martin McGuinness had fired a shot towards British Paratroopers, which ultimately led to retaliating fire and the event which is known today as ‘Bloody Sunday’.

These claims though were denied by McGuinness who blamed it on the British Army.

In recent years though, he set out on his political goals through political means and “abandoned” the use of violence.

Some say that this was just a political strategy. Others say he was sincere. And others say that he was merely trying to avoid prison and being held accountable for the murders and bombings he was responsible for.

A lesson can be learned here. That no matter how good or how evil you are, no matter if you try to run from or cover up your past, no matter how long you try to evade the consequences of your actions, no matter how powerful or how feeble you may be, death will always catch up.

And if, according to your belief system, you face judgement after you depart this existence, or if you’re bound to continuous reincarnation or reincarnate into a “lesser” life form as a result of your karmatic debt, justice will be served there.

But what we do know is that you will leave behind a legacy and a memory. Will you choose to leave behind a peaceful and positive memory where you have inflicted no harm upon another human? Or will you choose to leave behind pain, suffering and hatred, having inflicted death, harm and hurt upon hundreds of innocent people?